The Gen-Z platform landscape

Where does Gen-Z actually shop today?
Increasingly, not on traditional marketplaces. Instead, commerce is increasingly emerging across platforms where entertainment, social interaction and shopping blend together.

From a brand perspective, Gen-Z platforms can roughly be grouped into three categories.

Audience platforms

These platforms reach massive audiences and play a central role in content consumption, creator ecosystems and product discovery.
Examples include:

• YouTube
• Instagram
• Snapchat

These platforms are highly relevant for Gen-Z commerce overall, but they are first and foremost broad audience platforms.

Marketplace Universe Insight
Platforms like YouTube and Instagram play an enormous role in product discovery. At the same time, their scale and breadth make them difficult to analyse through a single commerce lens. They function as general-purpose attention platforms, where commerce is just one layer among many others such as entertainment, media and creator ecosystems.

Community platforms

Some platforms influence purchasing decisions primarily through discussion and peer interaction.
Examples include:

• Reddit
• Discord

Here, commerce tends to be more indirect. Products gain traction through reviews, niche communities and social validation rather than through built-in selling infrastructure.

At the same time, platforms in this category are beginning to experiment more actively with commerce. Reddit, for example, is currently testing AI-driven shopping functionality in the US, signalling that even community platforms may increasingly integrate product discovery and purchasing features in the future.

Commerce-native platforms

A smaller group of platforms places commerce much closer to the core user experience.
This article focuses on three of them:

• TikTok
• Roblox
• Whatnot

All three reach younger audiences. But unlike the audience platforms above, commerce is embedded directly in how these platforms work.That doesn’t mean they follow the same logic.
Quite the opposite.

Three very different models of Gen-Z commerce

Although TikTok, Roblox and Whatnot can all be described as commerce-native platforms, they represent three very different ways commerce can happen online.

Looking at these platforms side by side reveals a clear pattern: Gen-Z commerce is not converging around a single dominant platform. Instead, it is spreading across several ecosystems built around different user behaviours.

Marketplace Universe Insight
Platforms like YouTube and Instagram play an enormous role in product discovery. At the same time, their scale and breadth make them difficult to analyse through a single commerce lens. They function as general-purpose attention platforms, where commerce is just one layer among many others such as entertainment, media and creator ecosystems.

TikTok: algorithm-driven social commerce

TikTok, launched in 2016 by the Chinese technology company ByteDance, has evolved from a short-video entertainment platform into one of the most powerful product discovery engines for younger audiences.

The platform now reaches more than 1.5 billion monthly users worldwide, with particularly strong adoption among Gen-Z consumers. Short-form video combined with algorithmic recommendation allows products to spread at remarkable speed. Viral clips can generate massive demand within hours.

According to ECDB estimates, TikTok Shop generated more than $30 billion in global GMV in 2024, making it one of the fastest-growing social commerce ecosystems.

For a deeper analysis of TikTok’s marketplace infrastructure, see our previous Marketplace Universe article: TikTok Shop: Is it Worth it?

Core audience

TikTok’s user base is broad, but the platform remains one of the most important digital environments for Gen-Z consumers aged roughly 16–24. A large share of users under 30 actively use TikTok for product discovery, often encountering brands through creators rather than through traditional advertising.

Content format

TikTok’s commerce engine is fundamentally content-driven.
Products gain traction through:

• short-form videos
• creator reviews
• livestream shopping
• viral recommendation loops

The recommendation algorithm continuously surfaces engaging content, making discovery largely algorithmic rather than search-based.

Commerce infrastructure

TikTok’s commerce ecosystem is built around TikTok Shop, which integrates marketplace functionality directly into the platform.
Key elements include:

• in-app checkout
• seller product catalogues
• creator affiliate programs
• livestream shopping
• integrated fulfilment solutions in selected markets

Together, these features form a tightly integrated ecosystem connecting brands, creators and consumers.

Who sells here?

TikTok Shop mainly hosts professional sellers and brands, while creators act as distribution partners through affiliate programmes.
Examples of brands successfully using TikTok commerce include:

• e.l.f. Cosmetics
• Made by Mitchell
• Gymshark

These brands rely heavily on creator partnerships and viral product discovery.

Roblox: experience-driven commerce and virtual economies

Roblox, founded in 2006 in the United States by David Baszucki and Erik Cassel, is primarily known as a user-generated gaming platform where developers build interactive worlds and experiences that players explore together.

Over time, the platform has built one of the largest digital economies on the internet.

Roblox reports more than 85 million daily active users, with particularly strong engagement among younger audiences. Its creator ecosystem has also grown significantly, paying out more than $1 billion to developers through the DevEx programme.

A recent ChannelX analysis highlighted Roblox’s growing relevance for Gen-Z commerce, noting that the platform is increasingly evolving into a sales environment for both digital and physical products.

Core audience

Roblox’s audience is significantly younger than most social platforms.
Approximately:

• around 60 % of users are under 16
• the fastest-growing segment is 17–24

This places Roblox at the intersection of Gen-Z and Gen-Alpha audiences, making it one of the earliest digital environments where younger consumers interact with brands.

At the same time, the platform’s young user base has attracted increasing scrutiny. Critics and regulators have raised concerns about content moderation and the presence of experiences that may not always be age-appropriate, prompting ongoing debate about stronger moderation.
Despite these discussions, Roblox remains one of the largest digital environments for younger audiences.

Content format

Unlike TikTok, Roblox is built around interactive experiences rather than media content.
Developers create:

• games
• social environments
• branded worlds
• virtual events

Users participate through avatars and interact with both the environment and other players.
Commerce therefore happens inside experiences rather than through content feeds.

Commerce infrastructure

Roblox’s internal commerce system is built primarily around digital goods.
Users purchase items such as:

• avatar clothing
• accessories
• digital collectibles
• in-game upgrades

All transactions are made using the platform’s virtual currency Robux.

Developers can monetize their experiences by selling these items inside their games and convert earnings into real money through Roblox’s Developer Exchange (DevEx) programme.

Physical products can also play a role in Roblox commerce, but not through a native marketplace infrastructure comparable to TikTok Shop or Amazon.
Instead, physical commerce typically happens through:

• phygital products, where buying a real-world item unlocks digital items inside Roblox
• external store links embedded in brand experiences

In practice, Roblox still operates primarily as a digital goods economy.

Marketplace Universe Insight
Roblox functions less like a marketplace and more like a digital brand experience environmentthat can drive engagement and indirect product demand.

Who sells here?

Roblox sellers are typically developers, creators and brands that build experiences inside the platform.
Examples include:

• Nike (Nikeland)
• Vans (Vans World)
• Tommy Hilfiger

These brands typically create interactive branded environments rather than traditional product listings.

Whatnot: livestream marketplaces for collector communities

Whatnot, founded in 2019 in the United States, is a livestream commerce platform where sellers present products live while viewers bid in real time.

Originally launched as a marketplace for collectibles such as Funko Pop figures and trading cards, the platform has since expanded into categories including sneakers, comics and vintage fashion.

Industry estimates suggest Whatnot reached around $8 billion in GMV in 2025, highlighting the rapid growth of livestream commerce.

As Daniel Fisher, General Manager at Whatnot, explained in a Forbes interview, live shopping recreates elements of physical retail in a digital environment:
“It’s really about bringing the best of an in-store experience directly to your phone.”

Core audience

Whatnot’s audience differs significantly from TikTok and Roblox.
The platform is particularly popular among young adult collectors aged roughly 18–35.
Many users participate not only as buyers but also as active members of niche collector communities.

Content format

The platform’s central format is the livestream auction.
Sellers host live sessions where they:

• present products
• interact with viewers
• launch timed auctions

The format blends entertainment, community interaction and competitive bidding.

Commerce infrastructure

Whatnot operates structurally as a marketplace platform.
The platform provides:

• seller accounts
• integrated payments
• shipping tools
• livestream auction infrastructure

Who sells here?

Whatnot supports both professional sellers and individual collectors, making it a hybrid B2C and C2C marketplace.
Typical sellers include:

• trading card retailers
• sneaker resale shops
• vintage fashion sellers
• individual collectors

The platform is still largely dominated by specialist sellers rather than major consumer brands.

Key learnings for brands and retailers

Several patterns emerge when comparing TikTok, Roblox and Whatnot.

• Gen-Z commerce is fragmenting across different platform logics. Discovery, engagement and purchasing now happen across multiple environments.
• Content drives commerce on TikTok. Success depends heavily on creators, storytelling and viral product discovery.
• Experiences drive engagement on Roblox. Brands do not simply sell products but build interactive environments around them.
• Communities drive conversion on Whatnot. Trust, expertise and scarcity play a central role in these marketplaces.

For brands and retailers, the challenge is not simply joining another platform. The real question is which commerce model actually fits their products and audiences.

10.03.2026 – Written by Ricarda Eichler, Journalist and Author for OHN

Der Beitrag How TikTok, Roblox and Whatnot Are Reshaping Gen-Z Commerce erschien zuerst auf Marketplace Universe.

The quiet end of the static PDP

For years, the standard marketplace PDP was simple: a handful of clean product images, white background, maybe one model shot. That setup worked because marketplaces were optimised for catalogue efficiency — fast scanning, price comparison, functional buying.

That logic is breaking down.

Marketplaces are no longer just places to “find a product.” They are becoming discovery and inspiration environments, competing with social platforms for attention. And that shift fundamentally changes what kind of content performs.

Static images still matter — but on their own, they are no longer sufficient.

What Zalando is doing right now (and why it matters to sellers)

Zalando is a clear signal for where marketplace expectations are moving.

The platform has publicly shifted toward emotional commerce — shopping experiences optimised for engagement and confidence, not catalogue browsing. And Zalando has quantified the impact:

• So called “Elevated content” drives +10% higher engagement than standard product imagery
• When video is present, shoppers are up to 3x more likely to buy compared to static images alone
• Return rates decrease when richer visuals are used

That performance gap matters because modern ranking systems optimise for behaviour, not intent. Zalando’s own technology publications describe ranking models that learn from interaction signals such as viewing time, engagement and conversion.

For sellers, the implication is simple:
Static-image-only PDPs don’t just convert worse — they generate weaker signals and therefore get less distribution in search, category and discovery placements.

Marketplace Universe Insight
Static PDPs don’t fail you at the checkout.
They fail earlier — at distribution.

At the same time, Zalando is actively lowering the bar for rich content. Through AI-generated imagery, digital twins and automated production, content costs have been reduced by up to 90% and production cycles shortened from weeks to days.

Once a marketplace can scale premium visuals cheaply, the baseline shifts.
Static images alone stop being competitive — and visibility erodes.

The old dilemma: Video works — but it doesn’t scale

None of this is news to brands. Video has always converted better than static images. The real blocker has always been economics:

• Studio and crew: €80–150 per SKU
• Post-production and editing: €50–100 per SKU
• Localisation or variants: additional cost
  → €150–300+ per product video

On marketplaces with tight margins and large assortments, video was reserved for hero products — if at all. Enter AI.

From Video Production to Video Generation

AI changes the cost structure of video production entirely.

Instead of producing videos from scratch, solutions like Pixelmoda start with what brands already have: existing product images.

Pixelmoda’s Gianni Serazzi explained this clearly in our Marketplace Universe Webinar: four to five static images are enough to generate photorealistic motion. These “moving images” are not animations or gimmicks — they are visually indistinguishable from classic product videos, but created without cameras, sets, or editing pipelines.

That logic is grounded in a simple performance reality. In our podcast conversation, Serazzi puts it plainly:  “Video is the most converting asset.”

Which is exactly why Pixelmoda’s approach starts with the images brands already have — feeding them into the AI to generate realistic motion and video sequences, without traditional video production.

The raw images are used to train the AI on the physical behaviour of the product: how the fabric folds, how it drapes, how it reacts to movement.

Once this baseline is established, the AI can generate short, photorealistic motion sequences showcasing:

• subtle garment movement
• rotation and depth
• realistic fit behaviour

You can watch the full recording of our Webinar “How AI-driven product images & videos are boosting sales and cutting costs for Fashion Brands on Marketplaces” with Pixelmoda here: Watch Webinar now

When video stops being a luxury

Using AI to generate product videos unlocks three things at once:

1. Conversion uplift

Brands adding video to PDPs see +5% to +15% higher sales, driven purely by improved conversion.

2. Radical cost reduction

AI-based video creation reduces production costs by up to 90% compared to traditional video shoots.

3. Full assortment coverage

When video costs drop from hundreds to single-digit euros per SKU, it becomes viable to add video to every product, not just a curated few.

Some marketplaces now operate with no SKU going live without video — not because it’s fashionable, but because the ROI is structurally positive.

Static images: a visibility problem

The risk of relying on static images alone is not only that fewer shoppers convert once they land on your PDP. The bigger risk is that fewer shoppers land there at all.

In engagement-driven ranking systems:

• lower interaction → weaker signals
• weaker signals → less distribution
• less distribution → fewer clicks → fewer sales

Static-image-only PDPs don’t fail dramatically.
They fade.

Marketplace Universe Insight
PDP content has moved from “nice to have” to “system-relevant”.

The new baseline for marketplace content

The takeaway from this isn’t “everyone urgently needs flashy videos.”

Instead it is: Video is no longer a premium differentiator. It’s becoming the baseline.

In a marketplace environment where visibility, ranking, and conversion are tightly linked, sticking to static images alone is no longer a neutral choice.The winning strategy for 2026 isn’t bigger budgets.
It’s extracting more performance from the assets you already have.

22.01.2026 – Written by Ricarda Eichler, Journalist and Author for OHN

Der Beitrag Why your static PDP is dead: The shift to Video erschien zuerst auf Marketplace Universe.